Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in the Bariatric Patient: A Review of the Literature

| December 1, 2015

by Salvatore Docimo, Jr., DO, MS

Salvatore Docimo, Jr., DO, MS, is Clinical Instructor and Fellow, Department of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Bariatric Times. 2015;12(12):18–22.


ABSTRACT
Patients undergoing bariatric surgery are at an increased risk for venous thromboembolism. Despite this elevated risk, no standardized risk assessment tools for venous thromboembolism exist. A review of the literature was performed that evaluated the three prophylactic options a clinician has in their armamentarium to prevent venous thromboembolism: mechanical (sequential compression devices; chemical prophylaxis, such as unfractionated heparin and low-molecular weight heparin; and inferior vena cava filters. Despite multiple clinical studies, there is no consensus on a venous thromboembolism prevention algorithm. However, a recent position paper released by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery provided recommendations regarding venous thromboembolism prevention thay may be used by surgeons as a guideline to make the best clinical decision for their bariatric patients.

Introduction
Patients undergoing bariatric surgery are at an increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE).[1–4] The incidence of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients following bariatric surgery ranges from 0 to 5.4 percent[5,6] and 0 to 6.4 percent, respectively.[7–8] However, most large, prospective studies have demonstrated a VTE incidence of less than one percent for average risk bariatric patients,[9–11] with the majority occurring following discharge from the hospital within 30 days.[12] Though the incidence of VTE following bariatric surgery is comparable to other elective surgical procedures,[13] VTE remains a leading cause of mortality after bariatric surgery.[14–16]

Currently, no standardized risk assessment tools for VTE exist. However, an awareness of significant risk factors is required in order to not only prevent VTE, but also to expeditiously diagnose and treat VTE. Risk factors for VTE among bariatric patients include a prior VTE, a higher body mass index (BMI), age, gender, lack of mobility, pulmonary hypertension, venous stasis disorders, an increased operative time, and type of surgical approach.[9–12]

Prophylaxis Options
Prophylaxis against for VTE is comprises three options: mechanical (sequential compression devices [SCDs]); chemical prophylaxis, such as unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH); and inferior vena cava filters.

Mechanical prophylaxis. Mechanical prophylaxis is primarily composed of sequential compression devices and also ambulation. Previous studies have evaluated the benefit of mechanical prophylaxis in isolation over chemical prophylaxis in order to eliminate the risk of bleeding complications associated with LMWH or unfractionated heparin. A retrospective review[17] of 957 consecutive patients was performed to evaluate the ability of mechanical prophylaxis to prevent VTE. Patients enrolled in the study who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) received only calf-length SCDs before surgery and frequent ambulation postoperatively.17 A thirty-day DVT and PE rates of 0.31 percent and 0.10 percent, respectively were noted, along with a bleeding complication rate of 0.73 percent, less than previous bleeding complication rates with LMWH (4.8%).[17,18]

Chemical prophylaxis. One of the largest studies to date evaluating chemical prophylaxis was performed by the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative (MBSC), which evaluated 24,775 patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 2007 and 2012.[19] The study evaluated three prophylaxis strategies: UFH preoperatively and postoperatively (UFH/UFH), UFH preoperatively and LMWH postoperatively (UFH/LMWH), and LMWH preoperatively and postoperatively (LMWH/LMWH).19 Ninety-eight percent of the patients also received mechanical prophylaxis with SCDs. The rate of VTE was found to be lower for LMWH/ LMWH (0.25%) and UFH/LMWH (0.29%) groups than the UFH/UFH group (0.68%). The authors concluded LMWH is more effective than UFH for prevention of VTE among bariatric patients.

Limitations of the study do exist. For instance, complications such as the bleeding incidents associated with each various treatment modality was not adequately captured and described. The MBSC registry also did not capture any events that occurred beyond 30 days following the procedure. This could have significantly limited the number of VTE incidents.

In a study by Jamal et al,[20] a total of 4,293 patients undergoing bariatric surgery were assessed. Fifty-seven patients (1.3%) were found to have a VTE incident. Of the 57, 17 patients who were discharge on an extended prophylaxis for 2 to 4 weeks postoperatively were also found to have developed a VTE. However, it should be noted only one VTE-related mortality from this group with the extended VTE prophylaxis was documented. The patients in the study underwent two prophylaxis regiments. One regimen comprised an intraoperative injection of 5,000 units of subcutaneous unfractionated heparin, pneumatic compression devices, early postoperative ambulation, and routine anticoagulation in the form of LMWH 40 units twice a day. If the BMI was above 50kg/m2, the patient received 60 units of LMWH twice a day and an extended course of LMWH for two weeks postoperatively. For high-risk patients, an IVC filter was placed prior to surgery, and they received 5,000 units of unfractionated heparin and application of pneumatic compression devices pre- and post surgery. No extended LMWH was given in this high-risk group.[20]

Inferior vena cava filters. Inferior vena cava filters have also been recommended for use in high risk bariatric patients (i.e., BMI >55kg/m2, immobility, venous stasis, pulmonary hypertension, hypercoagulability and a history of VTE).[9]

Currently, the literature regarding the indications, risks, and benefits of IVC use in patients undergoing bariatric surgery are not definitive. Studies by Obeid et al[13] and Trigilio-Black et al[21] suggest a decreased rate of PE and death in patients receiving prophylactic IVC filters, whereas other studies have demonstrated a higher complication rate and risk of death attributable to device-related complications.[22] Table 1 provides a summary of current literature[8,13,21,30–33] regarding the use of IVC filters in bariatric patients. Recent recommendations by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery suggest the use of IVC filters, as the only method of VTE prophylaxis is not recommended.[9]

Discussion
Pulmonary embolism is a leading cause of mortality among high-risk patients undergoing bariatric surgery.[14] In certain situations, such as the trauma setting, IVC filters have been shown to be effective in the reduction of PE.[23] The use of IVC filters has been advocated in the high risk bariatric patients. In some institutions, IVC filters are placed routinely in bariatric patients who meet certain criteria signifying them as high-risk for VTE. Criteria include poor mobility, history of DVT, venous disease, history of PE, bronze skin changes of lower extremity, pulmonary compromise, and BMI over 60kg/m2.[13,21] However, it is important to note that no published data exist regarding the relative incidence of DVT or PE in low- and high-risk bariatric patients.[13]

The pathogenesis of VTE in the patient with morbid obesity is based upon the theory of Virchow’s Triad, which includes three factors: hypercoagulability, hemostasis, and vascular endothelial injury. At least one of these risk factors can be noted in over 90 perent of patients who develop documented VTE.[2,14,24–27] Obesity itself has also been suggested to be a significant independent risk factor for VTE.[2,24] Obesity potentiates biochemical changes, such as increased levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1).[25,26] Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 decreases the fibrinolytic activity by blocking the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin, thus creating a hypercoagulable state and an increased risk for VTE.[25,26]

Increased levels of leptin and fibrinogen have also been documented in the obese population.[27] Leptin has been shown to increase the expression of PAI-1 in coronary artery endothelial cells in vitro.[28] Hyperfibrinogenemia, which has been noted in obese patients, is strongly associated with an increased risk of VTE due to elevated levels of fibrinogen which lead to increased levels of fibrin and thrombosis.[27]

In addition to the physiologic changes noted in obese patients, bariatric surgery itself increases the risk of VTE. Reverse Trendelenburg positioning and the pneumoperitoneum utilized during laparoscopy decreases the venous return to the heart, which further potentiates the prothrombotic state. The postoperative sequale of pain and poor ambulation further increases VTE risk.[27] However, it should be noted that when using bariatric surgery as the baseline for VTE incidents, Mukherjee et al[29] found that the odds of developing a VTE were higher in bariatric surgery compared to other abdominal surgery, such as colorectal surgery (1.87; p <0.001), pancreatectomy (2.07; p <0.001), gastrectomy (2.44; p <0.001), esophagectomy (2.47; p<0.001), hepatectomy (2.55; p <0.001), and splenectomy (2.69; p <0.001).[29]

The greatest challenge facing the prevention and treatment of VTE in bariatric patients is the lack of class I evidence. The difficulty arises in the dearth of randomized, controlled studies evaluating the various types of preventative measures available during bariatric surgery. Though no class I evidence exists that can definitively provide recommendations regarding the type or duration of VTE prophylaxis in bariatric patients, the ASMBS did provide the following recommendations in a 2013 publication.[9] Their statement position is summarized in Table 2.

Conclusion
The risk of VTE in bariatric surgical patients is omnipresent. However, a consensus VTE prophylaxis still remains elusive as we attempt to determine the safest, most effective means to prevent VTE. Recommendations by the ASMBS should be used by surgeons as a guideline to make the best clinical decision for their bariatric patients as they see fit until randomized, controlled clinical trials can be conducted.

References
1.    Stein PD, Goldman J. Obesity and thromboembolic disease. Clin Chest Med. 2009;30:489–93, viii.
2.    Stein PD, Beemath A, Olson RE. Obesity as a risk factor in venous thromboembolism. Am J Med. 2005;118:978–980.
3.    Stein PD, Matta F, Goldman J. Obesity and pulmonary embolism: the mounting evidence of risk and the mortality paradox. Thromb Res. 2011;128:518–23.
4.    Allman-Farinelli MA. Obesity and venous thrombosis: a review. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2011;37:903–907
5.    Quebbemann B, Akhondzadeh M, Dallal R. Continuous intravenous heparin infusion prevents peri-operative thromboembolic events in bariatric surgery patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1221–1224.
6.    Scholten DJ, Hoedema RM, Scholten SE. A comparison of two different prophylactic dose regimens of low molecular weight heparin in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2002;12:19–24.
7.    Escalante-Tattersfield T, Tucker O, Fajnwaks P, et al. Incidence of deep vein thrombosis in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:126–130.
8.    Kardys CM, Stoner MC, Manwaring ML, et al. Safety and efficacy of intravascular ultrasound-guided inferior vena cava filter in super obese bariatric patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:50–54.
9.    American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Clinical Issues Committee. ASMBS updated position statement on prophylactic measures to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism in bariatric surgery patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(4):493–497.
10.    Becattini C, Agnelli G, Manina G, et al. Venous thromboembolism after laparoscopic bariatric surgery for morbid obesity: clinical burden and prevention. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012; 8:108–115
11.    Finks JF, English WJ, Carlin Am, et al. Predicting risk for venous thromboembolism with bariatric surgery; results from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. Ann Surg. 2012; 255:1100–1104.
12.    Winegar DA, Sherif B, Pate V, DeMaria EJ. Venous thromboembolism after bariatric surgery performed by Bariatric Surgery Center of Excelence Participants: Analaysis of the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:181–188.
13.    Obeid FN, Bowling WM, Fike JS, Durant JA. Efficacy of prophylactic inferior vena cava filter placement in bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:606–608.
14.    Sapala JA, Wood MH, Schuhknecht MP, Sapala MA. Fatal pulmonary embolism after bariatric operations for morbid obesity: A 24-year retrospective analysis. Obes Surg. 2003;13:819–825.
15.    Rocha AT, de Vasconcellows AG, da Luz Neto ER, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized obese medical patients and in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1645–1655.
16.    Andersen T, Juhl E, Quaade F. Fatal outcomes after jejunoileal bypass for obesity. Am J Surg. 1981;142:619–621.
17.    Clements RH, Yellumahanthi K, Ballem N, Wesley M, Bland KI. Pharacologic prophylaxis against venous thromboembolic coplciations is not mandatory for all laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:917–921; discussion 921–923.
18.    Frantzides Ct, Welle Sn, Ruff TM, Frantzides AT. Routine anti-coagulation for venous thromboembolism prevention following laparoscopic gastric bypass. JSLS. 2012;16:33–37.
19.    Birkmeyer NJ, Finks JF, Carlin Am, et al. Comparative effectiveness of unfractionated and low-molecular weight heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism following bariatric surgery. Arch Surg. 2012;147:994–998.
20.    Jamal MH1, Corcelles R, Shimizu H, Kroh M, Safdie FM, Rosenthal R, Brethauer SA, Schauer PR. Thromboembolic events in bariatric surgery: A large multi-institutional referral center experience. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(2):376–380.
21.    Trigilio-Black CM, Ringley CD, McBride CL, et al. Inferior vena cava filter placement for pulmonary embolism risk reduction in super morbidly obese undergoing bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:461–464.
22.    Birkmeyer NJ, Share D, Baser O, et al. Preoperative placement of inferior vena cava filters and outcomes after gastric bypass surgery. Ann Surg. 2010;252:313–318.
23.    Carlin AM, Tyburski JG, Wilson RF, Steffes C. Prophylactic and therapeutic inferior vena cava filters to prevent pulmonary emobli in trauma patients. Arch Surg. 2002;137:521–525.
24.    Ageno W, Becattini C, Brighton T, Selby R, Kamphuisen PW. Cardiovascular risk factors and venous thromboembolism: A meta-analysis. Circulation. 2008;117(1):93–102.
25.    Pannacciulli N, De Mitrio V, Marino R, Giorgino R, De Pergola G. Effect of glucose tolerance status on PAI-1 plasma levels in overweight and obese subjects. Obes Res. 2002;10 (8):717–725.
26.    Juhan-Vague I, Alessi MC, Mavri A, Morange PE. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, inflammation, obesity, insulin resistance and vascular risk. J Thromb Haemost. 2003;1(7): 1575–1579.
27.    Schauer PR. Venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in the bariatric surgery patient. In: Schauer PR, Schirmer BD, Brethauer S (eds.) Minimally Invasive Bariatric Surgery. New York: Springer, 2007.
28.    Singh P, Peterson TE, Barber KR,  et al. Leptin upregulates the expression of plasmino- gen activator inhibitor-1 in human vascular endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;392(1):47–52.
29.    Mukherjee D, Lidor AO, Chu KM, Gearhart SL, Haut ER, Chang DC. Postoperative venous thromboembolism rates vary significantly after different types of major abdominal operations. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(11):2015–2022.
30.    Vaziri K, Devin Watson J, Harper AP, et al. Prophylactic inferior vena cava filters in high-risk bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2011;21(10):1580–1584.
31.    Piano G, Ketteler ER, Prachand V, et al. Safety, feasibility, and outcome of retrievable vena cava filters in high-risk surgical patients. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(4):784–788.
32.    Gargiulo NJ 3rd, Veith FJ, Lipsitz EC, et al. Experience with inferior vena cava filter placement in patients undergoing open gastric bypass procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44(6):1301–1305. Epub 2006 Oct 20.
33.    Vaziri K, Bhanot P, Hungness ES, et al. Retrievable inferior vena cava filters in high-risk patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(10):2203–2207.
33.    Keeling WB, Haines K, Stone PA, Armstrong PA, Murr MM, Shames ML. Current indications for preoperative inferior vena cava filter insertion in patients undergoing surgery for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2005;15(7):1009-–1012.

FUNDING: No funding was provided.

DISCLOSURES: The author reports no conflicts relevant to the content of this article.

Tags: , , ,

Category: Past Articles, Review

Comments are closed.